Research questions

What does the story of a dog that can perform incredible feats in front of a stunned audience have to do with a late antique work of universal history? In his Chronographia, written in the 6th century AD, the author John Malalas covers biblical and Ancient history as well as the contemporary history of his own time. In his historical narrative, he often strings together thematically unrelated episodes, raising the question of the narrative’s coherence. But even late antique historical works that offer a more consistent narrative, such as Procopius’ Persian Wars, offer numerous deviations from the main storyline. This leads to the following principal questions with regard to late antique historiographical works: Why did the authors regularly include digressive passages in their historical works that provide additional geographical or mythical information which is not necessarily needed? How can obviously implausible miracle stories such as the one about the talented dog be compatible with a historiographical work that is intended to convey historical facts? According to which principles did the authors compile their texts and for which audience did they create such works?

The text corpus

The present project seeks to answer these key questions by analysing the narrative form of digression, i.e. the deviation from the main storyline. The research looks at a representative sample of late antique Greek historiographical works from the 5th to the early 7th century AD. These can be classified into three different, but not strictly separated, groups: (1.) writings that are modelled on classical historiographical works and deal with an epoch, a theme or specific characters; these are the works of the authors Zosimus, Procopius, Agathias and Theophylact Simocatta; (2.) chronicles, i.e. universal histories such as the Chronographia by Malalas, which tell the story of the creation of the world from a Christian perspective and reach up to the time of the author; and (3.) church histories, which also offer a Christian view of historical events and are focused on the development of the still-young Christian church and its institutions; these are the writings of Socrates, Sozomen, Theodoret of Cyrrhus, Philostorgius and Evagrius Scholasticus.

Innovations

For the first time, these writings – which have so far often been regarded as mere religious-historical source material – are being considered first and foremost as literary works. The aim of the project, therefore, is to understand and explain the narrative techniques and stylistic features of late antique Greek historiography. The results of the project work will provide new insights for the fields of Classical Philology, Ancient History, Byzantine and Literary Studies.

Selected Bibliography

  • Allen, Pauline 1981. Evagrius Scholasticus the church historian, Leuven.
  • Bäbler, Balbina 2001. “Der Blick über die Reichsgrenzen: Sokrates und die Bekehrung Georgiens”, in: Bäbler / Nesselrath 2001, 159–181.
  • Bäbler, Balbina / Heinz-Günther Nesselrath (eds.) 2001. Die Welt des Sokrates von Konstantinopel: Studien zu Politik, Religion und Kultur im späten 4. und frühen 5. Jh. n. Chr. zu Ehren von Christoph Schäublin, München / Leipzig.
  • Baumann, Mario / Vasileios Liotsakis (eds.) 2024. Digressions in classical historiography, Berlin / Boston.
  • Bleckmann, Bruno 2015. “Techniken tendenziöser Historiographie: Philostorgius und die Traditionen profaner Geschichtsschreibung”, in: Wallraff 2015, 133–152.
  • Bleckmann, Bruno 2021. Die letzte Generation der griechischen Geschichtsschreiber. Studien zur Historiographie im ausgehenden 6. Jahrhundert, Stuttgart.
  • Bleckmann, Bruno / Markus Stein (eds.) 2015. Philostorgios: Kirchengeschichte, 2 vols., Paderborn.
  • Borsch, Jonas / Oliver Gengler / Mischa Meier (eds.) 2019. Die Weltchronik des Johannes Malalas im Kontext spätantiker Memorialkultur, Stuttgart.
  • Bouffartigue, Jean 2001. “Le texte de Théodoret et le texte de ses document”, in: Pouderon / Duval 2001, 315–327.
  • Brodka, Dariusz 2004. Die Geschichtsphilosophie in der spätantiken Historiographie. Studien zu Prokopios von Kaisareia, Agathias von Myrina und Theophylaktos Simokattes, Frankfurt a.M. et al.
  • Brodka, Dariusz / Michał Stachura (eds.) 2007. Continuity and change: studies in late antique historiography, Kraków.
  • Cameron, Averil 1969/1970. “Agathias on the Sassanians”, Dumbarton Oaks Papers 23/24, 67–183.
  • Cameron, Averil 1970. Agathias, Oxford.
  • Cameron, Averil 1985. Procopius and the sixth century, London et al.
  • Cameron, Averil (ed.) 1989. History as text: the writing of ancient history, London.
  • Carrara, Laura / Mischa Meier / Christine Radtki-Jansen (eds.) 2017. Die Weltchronik des Johannes Malalas: Quellenfragen, Stuttgart
  • Cesa, Maria 1983. “Etnografia e geografia nella visione storica di Procopio di Cesarea”, Studi Classici e Orientali 32, 189–215.
  • Chesnut, Glenn F. 1977. The first Christian histories: Eusebius, Socrates, Sozomen, Theodoret, and Evagrius, Paris.
  • Chrysanthou, Chrysanthos S. 2024. “Digressions in Herodian’s History of the Empire”, in: Baumann / Liotsakis 2024, 273–307.
  • Colvin, Ian 2013. “Reporting battles and understanding campaigns in Procopius and Agathias: classicising historians’ use of archived documents as sources”, in: Alexander Sarantis / Neil Christie (eds.), War and warfare in late antiquity, vol. 2, Leiden, 571–597.